Chelsea 7 Sunderland 2: an appreciation


Niall Quinn and Steve Bruce are apparently the guests on Goals on Sunday, on Sky tomorrow. How will they explain away this humiliation? Colin Randall is still apoplectic after another shambolic away performance …

“Appreciate,” gloated the lippy teenager in blue as she walked past the Sunderland end on the way back to her front-row seat after a wander into the concourse nearly stopped her seeing the fourth goal.

And yes, Chelsea were very, very good. But how good did they actually need to be to sweep aside the feeblest back four and midfield display I have seen in a long time? Which half-decent Premier side would not have found us a doddle today?

No return to the glories of 2001, when Don Hutchison and Kevin Phillips led the way in a super-effective performance that saw us win 4-2.

By the time Chelsea went one up, before eight minutes had been clocked up, they could have scored twice. Our defending was woeful even by comparison with all the other woeful defensive displays on the road this season.

Hearts had already sunk towards ankle level when we saw the midfield line-up announced as Malbranque, Meyler, Henderson and Murphy. Lorik Cana’s combative qualities in that department were desperately missed, though the one mitigation I’ll offer Steve Bruce is that it is difficult to see how he would then have made up the numbers for back four. Why? Injuries, yes. But why was Michael Turner missing? Because our crass decision to appeal against his red card at Man City, a move that never had more than a snowball’s chance in hell of succeeding, extended his ban by one match.

How can Bruce take positives from this game? I haven’t seen his post-match quotes yet but hope he won’t even have the nerve to try*.

We had a purple patch of about four-and-a-half minutes after Zenden managed to get back to 5-1 at a time when it seemed the Spurs defeat of Wigan might be made to look a little restrained. And wags were able to say after Bent’s last-second goal that we might have snatched a draw had the referee only added a bit more time.

But gallows humour doesn’t make any execution seem less deadly. A massive defeat was on the cards from the first or second minute.

The only football we played in the first half came in two bursts of cleverness from Malbranque. They led to nothing, of course, and Steed didn’t then last even as long as usual, substituted at half time.

On the 2 part of our 4-4-2 formation, I am torn between modest sympathy for Bent and Jones, acknowledging the abysmal lack of service, and sufficient realism to admit that until Bent’s goal, neither looked remotely like scoring anyway.

Learn from this, Steve and Niall. Act swiftly on our obvious deficiencies. Or settle down to our third relegation battle in successive seasons.

* Late addition: fair play to Bruce. He did cite the weakened nature of the side, but also said: “It hurts – nobody likes to get beat like that, in the manner and easiness of which Chelsea have beaten us.

“Defensively we were just inept and unfortunately we couldn’t cope with them. They were too good for us on the day and sometimes you’ve got to put your hands up and say they were just far too good for us.”

Tags: , , , ,

Salut! Sunderland is written, illustrated and edited by - and principally for - supporters of Sunderland AFC. The site aims to be sufficiently literate and entertaining to appeal to people who do not follow SAFC but enjoy good football writing.

7 Responses to “Chelsea 7 Sunderland 2: an appreciation” Subscribe

  1. Tony January 16, 2010 at 9:34 pm #

    The defence wouldn’t have been worse if I was playing. What does Bruce have against playing Zenden from the start?

  2. Yiannis Skindilias January 17, 2010 at 12:09 am #

    Steve Bruce could have tried something different e.g. McCartney as a centre back… wouldn’t that still be just an experiment? He couldn’t really risk an unfit player to play the whole match (zenden), but that line-up was bound to get battered.
    If SB is in fault at some part it ‘s probably the squad size.
    Murphy and Healy are still hanging around but Collins and Leadbitter have been got rid of, while the Nozza gets a contract extension. No cover what so ever.
    But then again 7-8 first team players unavailable is a rough patch isn’t it?

  3. Sam H January 18, 2010 at 10:31 am #

    From what I remember of George McCartney, he’s really not suited to centre back…just for what it’s worth!

  4. Tony January 18, 2010 at 6:55 pm #

    At the moment he’s not a full back.

  5. Yiannis Skindilias January 19, 2010 at 10:45 am #

    “Sam H says:
    January 18, 2010 at 10:31 am

    From what I remember of George McCartney, he’s really not suited to centre back…just for what it’s worth!”

    That’s exactly what i meant.. he looks unable to do most tasks during the last year or so.


  1. Chelsea: a massacre Observed | Salut! Sunderland - January 17, 2010

    […] Chelsea 7 Sunderland 2: an appreciation […]

  2. Time to stop hating Chelsea? | Salut! Sunderland - April 26, 2010

    […] Chelsea, barring an upset to compare with Sunderland v Leeds in 1973 (brought about in large measure by Ian Porterfield, a player remembered fondly at both our clubs), will probably win a double by breaking Pompey hearts at Wembley on May 15. We don’t actually have to start liking Chelsea very much. But after the demolition of Stoke, I cannot help recalling the gobby teenage girl in Blue who, as the goals mounted up in similarly alarming fashion against us, walked past Sunderland fans and offered the one-word advice: “Appreciate.” […]

Leave a Reply

Walsall Guess the Score: ‘can we play you every week? Oh, we already do’

The experience of Saturday prompts a rule addition for the Salut! Sunderland prize Guess the Score: a match abandoned = […]

Wham: Going ballistic at Accrington Stanley

McCormick's Craic(featured image) full size 640 x 138

There has been a bit of discussion on the calling off and whether (no pun intended) it was or wasn’t […]

Salut Sunderland’s advent calendar day 10 and another crucial game

Salut Banner2(featured image)

In the run up to Christmas Day, behind each door of the Salut! Sunderland advent calendar is an article written […]

Sixer’s Substitute’s Soapbox: a wet weekend in Accrington

Sixer's Soapbox (featured image)

Jake: ‘that wasn’t in the script’ Play this and read on!LA = Lancashire – Accrington Malcolm Dawson writes…….there was a […]

The First Time Ever I Saw Your Ground: Accrington Stanley and the Crown Ground

Salut Banner4(featured image)

John McCormick writes: all being well I’ll be there. Given the chance, what self respecting football supporter wouldn’t go to […]

Accrington Stanley Who are You?: ‘borrow a bigger ground? Would SAFC borrow St James’ Park?’

Click Jake's image to see all Who are You? instalments so far this season

Monsieur Salut writes: we are delighted to welcome Peter Leatham*, chairman of the Accrington Stanley Supporters’ Club, to this season’s […]

Page generated in 0.999 seconds. Stats plugin by