Jake: 'the doubt has currently been removed - defo no prize'

Jake: this time you definitely won’t. Unless…..

John McCormick writes: Rodney Marsh had moved from QPR by the time I went to live in London but they were still a club to admire.

Panache, perhaps, would be the word that best fitted them as they came close, oh, so close, to winning the League, and how we neutrals wanted them to.

hero to villain last time at Spurs

Will he recover from his mystery illness and score the winner?

Today, though, they’re just another ex-premiership team, struggling to stabilise in the championship and, like us, hoping to shrug off a narrow defeat to a high flying team over the weekend.

Will they? Or, as this week’s guest, John Crowley, thinks, will we continue our cup success (such as it is)? John thinks we’ll win 2-1, which I also think is possible, but as neither of us are eligible for the non-mug someone else can have that score, or indeed any other.

Now’s your chance to give us your opinion and to not win a mug (unless M Salut decides otherwise).  Predictions, indeed any posts, from first-time contributors are held for moderation but we will know when they were sent.  No-one got the Spurs result right, or the Everton game which preceded it, so it’s odds on someone will win the non-mug and it could be you

So as I said last time, Be brave, be positive, be a winner! qpraway

Tags: ,

Salut! Sunderland is written, illustrated and edited by - and principally for - supporters of Sunderland AFC. The site aims to be sufficiently literate and entertaining to appeal to people who do not follow SAFC but enjoy good football writing.

8 Responses to “QPR v Sunderland: Guess the score” Subscribe

  1. William C September 19, 2016 at 9:25 pm #

    Got to keep positive. 1-0 to SAFC.

  2. Phil D September 20, 2016 at 12:30 am #

    Depends on how much the team is changed.
    A confidence boosting 2-0 to the lads.

  3. Eric012 September 20, 2016 at 5:30 am #

    We need to score 7 to shut the mags up , but I’ll settle for 0 – 0 with a win on pens eventually.

    • William C September 20, 2016 at 9:52 pm #

      If it goes to penalties, I’d back Jordan Pickford against most [ but will he play? ]

  4. david miller September 20, 2016 at 12:43 pm #

    3-2 to the lads, although I suspect Eric may be correct.

  5. Mike September 20, 2016 at 6:12 pm #

    The Lads to win 3-1 and the start of a winning run.

  6. Robbo September 21, 2016 at 10:23 am #

    A nice 3-0 win to SAFC

  7. salutsunderland September 22, 2016 at 1:32 am #

    Glad we won the game, glad no one won Guess the Score which means I can carry over a prize to Saturday’s game

Leave a Reply

Sixer’s sevens: Hanging on against Doncaster Rovers – that’ll do nicely.

Sixer's Sevens (featured image)

Our service could be a bit delayed tomorrow. Not only has Pete Sixsmith to get home, he’ll probably have to […]

The First Time Ever I Saw Your Ground: Doncaster Rovers and the Keepmoat Stadium

Salut Banner5(featured image)

John McCormick writes: Yorkshire seems to be cropping up a lot, even though we  left a few of their clubs […]

‘4,000 Sunderland fans, midweek game says it all’. Doncaster Rovers Who are You?

Click Jake's image to see all Who are You? instalments so far this season

Monsieur Salut writes: Pete Sixsmith has, as ever, written a wonderful article on Doncaster Rovers for his twin series on […]

Doncaster Rovers vs SAFC Guess the Score

Click Jake's image to enter

For this midweek visit to Doncaster Rovers, Salut! Sunderland reverts to a “just for fun” format for the Guess the […]

Sixer’s Shrewsbury Soapbox: Success in Salop

Sixer'sSoapbox(featured image)

  John McCormick writes: It’s only 70-80 miles from home to the New Meadow but three trains meant for a time-consuming journey.  […]

Sixer’s Shrewsbury Sevens: 2-0 to SAFC, a comfortable win and that elusive clean sheet

Sixer's Sevens (featured image)

Monsieur Salut writes: this is where Pete Sixsmith offers his customary seven-word verdict on each Sunderland game he attends. He […]

Page generated in 1.034 seconds. Stats plugin by www.blog.ca