John McCormick: bored

John McCormick: stats is thirsty work

During the close season we gave readers the opportunity to select their relegation favourites from the entire Premier league. Then we asked readers to select three candidates from the eight clubs which came top.

By  the season’s start some 3,500 votes had been cast in our relegation poll

Hull were firm favourites to go down, with Burnley and Sunderland giving the North a full house. Watford weren’t far behind Sunderland, then came ‘Boro, Bournemouth and West Brom, followed by one hundred votes  for “another club” and finally Crystal Palace, whose 67 votes (we got three times as many to become third favourites) must surely mean safety for them.

How are the eight doing? 

It’s a bit mixed. Here’s the situation after game 11, with   Swansea also in the frame as that “other club”. Swansea are currently in 19th place,  although I’m sure not all of the 100 who chose “another club” opted specifically for them back in August:

relegation_poll_nov-2016

Hull and Sunderland (as ever) are deep in danger but Burnley are in the top half of the table and Watford are above them. Of the others, ‘Boro  and Palace appear to be at greatest risk.

This wasn’t always the case, as the graph below shows.

My chosen measure of progress, or the lack of it, is the average number of points needed from each remaining game in order to reach thirty-nine points by the end of the season.  All clubs begin the season needing 1.03 points per game to reach thirty-nine points. Win and this number goes down, lose and it goes up. Any club that gets to the position of needing  zero points per game will have got to thirty-nine points, and any club requiring three points or more per game will never get to thirty-nine and will therefore be going down, or so says my dodgy logic.

Hull and ‘Boro started well, heading up the league, whereas we headed downwards. But while we kept going down until we hit bottom Hull and ‘Boro didn’t keep going up. Their fortunes reversed and it wasn’t until recently that they got back on track:

graph1v2_nov2016

Watford started poorly but soon recovered and despite some inconsistency and a recent spanking they’re sitting pretty in the top half. The other chosen clubs – WBA, Burnley, Bournemouth and Palace – have also had their ups and downs, especially Palace, who aren’t yet sitting pretty despite us gifting them three points. I don’t think any of these clubs will be able to relax for a while yet.

That said, trendlines do show these four (even Palace, who have the same points as Middlesbrough) in a much better light than Sunderland, Hull, and  ‘Boro. These three clubs are on a downward trend whereas the others are edging upwards:

trendline1v2

fit to wear the shirt, cracked ribs or not

fit to wear the shirt, cracked ribs or not

You can see how desperate Sunderland’s plight is – not only is the gap between them and the other clubs so wide but their downward gradient is steeper than the others. That doesn’t mean all is lost, however. They do have their first win under their belt and they may have found a saviour in Anichebe. They could even move above Swansea with a win or two.

Hull also appeared to be on the slide but they too had a good win last weekend; there’s surely a crunch match between these clubs in a couple of weeks, possibly even a season-defining one.

And while ‘Boro don’t look too healthy it has to be said they’re a lot healthier now than they were in mid-October; no-one can argue with a point against Man City.

So it’s possible all three clubs  have turned a corner, just as it’s possible clubs like Palace and maybe even West Ham could dip downwards and enter the death zone.

In other words, whatever those dodgy trendlines say (and you should never head off to the bookies ‘cos you’ve seen them*), it’s still early days. We have an idea of how clubs are doing, we have an idea of how they compare, and we have an idea of what they need to do to ensure safety. But there are twenty-seven games left and another transfer window to come. The best I can do is to repeat what I wrote in August: “I have a feeling it won’t be exactly as our voters seem to think”.

Maybe we’ll have a better idea at Christmas.

Join the Salut! Sunderland Facebook group – click anywhere along this line


And follow us on Twitter: @salutsunderland … click along this line

you don't have to be Einstein to know our chances aren't good

you don’t have to be Einstein to know our chances aren’t good

*For the mathematically inclined, there’s a value known as the R2, which indicates how well a trendline fits the points on the graph. The nearer to 1 the better the fit. The R2 values for most of the other clubs’ trendlines  are very low, so they aren’t a good fit.

Sunderland’s trendline has an R2 of 0.95. The message is, Be afraid, Be very afraid

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Salut! Sunderland is written, illustrated and edited by - and principally for - supporters of Sunderland AFC. The site aims to be sufficiently literate and entertaining to appeal to people who do not follow SAFC but enjoy good football writing.

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Post-Bolton thoughts: as Brian Clough said…

McCormick's Craic(featured image) full size 640 x 138

By now you’ll have read Pete Sixsmith’s report from Bolton. I can’t find fault with it and there’s no point in […]

SAFC vs Middlesbrough Guess the Score: Boro licking their lips

Click on the image above, post your scoreline prediction and - whoever you support - you may win a prize

Without needing to try too hard, we can place Sunderland vs Middlesbrough and a handful of other games between now […]

Sixer’s Bolton Soapbox: Sunderland lacking up front after going behind

Sixer's Soapbox (featured image)

John McCormick writes: the only pleasure associated with last night was that I met up with Pete Sixsmith and Pete […]

Chroniclers of doom. Where, Ellis Short, will SAFC be a year hence?

what's going on, Ellis?
Photo courtesy of safc.com

Gloomy times, gloomy thoughts from Monsieur Salut … No football club, whatever its history, has a divine right to play […]

Bolton Wanderers vs SAFC: their turn to ask the questions

Salut Banner4(featured image)

Scroll down for a Bolton Q+A session – Gabe John from the Burnden Aces fan site seeking answers from Monsieur […]

Bolton Wanderers Who are You?: ‘overpaid players who won’t fight for club’

Jake says: 'click the Who are You? banner to see the series so far this season'

Michael Gething is the chairman of London Whites, the London branch of the Bolton Wanderers supporters’ club. He knows people […]