Ken Gambles: ‘would a Gooner rhyme my surname with stumbles?’

One minor regret of our 10 seasons in the Premier League is that this spell ends without the authorities taking up the ingenious suggestions from our own Ken Gambles of making shirt-pullers wear bright pink knitted mittens and divers pull on goggles. Undeterred, Ken has come up with other thoughts on rule changes, this time proposing sanctions designed to punish offending teams, not humiliate individuals …

There will be ample time for inquests on this benighted season of ours subsequent to May 21, so before then I’d just like to raise a few issues about the game at large.

Call me a traditionalist – I do – as one brought up on a working-class game that has formed a major part of my life for over 60 years.

There’s much about the modern game I dislike but I’m stuck with it until I go to that stadium in the sky. I’m not a fan of changing the laws of football yet I must admit my reservations about the back pass law proved wrong and it has greatly helped the flow of a match.There are though some further changes I would like to see.

The first two would be easy to effect and would change what at present gives an unfair advantage.

From a goal kick, if the ball does not leave the area (unless prevented from doing so by an opposition player) a corner should result as it has always seemed unfair that there is no disadvantage to the side making a mistake. Also if a goalkeeper is fouled yet retains possession of the ball it penalises him to be made to take a deadball kick rather than allowing play to restart with a kick from his hands.

More difficult changes concern the blatant time-wasting which increasingly blights most games I watch.

There should be no substitutions allowed after 80 minutes.

Should extra time be needed then any remaining subs could then be used. This should prevent the procession of hold-ups which seem a preponderance in the last 15 minutes of most games and are extremely frustrating even when Sunderland are not involved.

Furthermore if goalkeepers are deemed to be wasting time over a goal kick (Ben Foster can take as long as 45 seconds to a minute to take his), a corner should be awarded.

When players clearly take the ball up to the corner flag to waste time, just give a goal kick. Likewise the infuriating non-taking of a corner that barely leaves the quadrant should be penalised by a goal-kick,

I realise these changes would mean more decisions for the referee to make but I am totally fed up with games being deliberately spoiled because teams seem to lack confidence in their own ability to hold on to a scoreline and consequently cheat the crowd of action.

Tags: , ,

Salut! Sunderland is written, illustrated and edited by - and principally for - supporters of Sunderland AFC. The site aims to be sufficiently literate and entertaining to appeal to people who do not follow SAFC but enjoy good football writing.

3 Responses to “Gambles Rambles: time to punish timewasters and ban late substitutions” Subscribe

  1. Graeme Garvey May 10, 2017 at 1:26 pm #

    A number of good points, here. These dodges are all about trying to kill off a game, aren’t they? Everyone knows it goes on, so why not try some (or all) of these ideas? The 80-minute substitution ban and goal kick for taking the ball to the corner would be worth trying just to see what ruses they’d then dream up to waste time.

  2. david miller May 11, 2017 at 1:13 pm #

    Can’t see the 80 minute subs idea taking on, players will just pretend they’re injured to get replaced.

    Goalies time-wasting goal kicks irritate the life out of me. There should be a 20 second rule.

    Having said that, Shack created another bit of folklore by backheeling a corner for a throw in, knowing it would waste time, it confused everyone.

    And I recall Baxter hitting the sweetest curling 60 yarder into the far corner of the main stand at Roker, where no-one was sitting (no ball boys in those days), and it wasted at least a minute, we all had a laugh.

  3. KenG May 11, 2017 at 7:54 pm #

    David,you are probably right but I would say no subs irrespective of injuries or not. You would just have to play with one man down for ten minutes or so.

Leave a Reply

The First Time Ever I Saw Your Ground: Goodison, ‘my favourite after Roker’

Sixer'sSoapbox(featured image)

Yesterday Bernard Walker expressed his love for Goodison Park.  Pete Sixsmith will understand why, for it is, as he says […]

Everton vs Sunderland prize Guess the Score: a brief return to the big time

Jake kicks off a new season of Guess the Score

Monsieur Salut introduces another prize edition of Guess rhe Score and promises belated movement on the backlog of winners … […]

Everton Who are You?: ‘Pickford looks a great signing; Kone never did impress me’

Jake: 'let's be having you'

John McCormick writes: I talk to Evertonians most weeks. They tend not to be short of opinions – like most […]

Sixer’s Hull City Soapbox: Simon Grayson’s big band still not hitting all the right notes

Sixer's Soapbox (featured image)

Malcolm Dawson writes……while I was watching Pete Sixsmith‘s home town club of Shildon progress to the next round of the […]

Sixer’s sevens: Hull City invoke the curse of the former player

Sixer's Sevens (featured image)

At the end Hull City had three of our former players on the pitch, so it had to happen. Nevertheless, […]

Hull City Who are You? : (2) Arsenal ‘cheating’, toxic Tiger times, ‘new fans’

Jake: 'well knock me down with a feather'

For the second part of Gary Clark‘s* epic replies to Salut! Sunderland‘s questions – in fact not always replies but […]