Monsieur Salut keeps his promise (threat?) to repeat the obvious poll as developments present themselves. You can check the results for yourselves but as the number of votes cast reached 600, we were just above 82 per cent not just wanting but believing in promotion …

Salut! Sunderland’s associate editor John McCormick has already bagged naming rights should Jack Ross – could a Sunderland manager be blessed with a better moniker? – restore the tradition of post-match managerial e-mails.  They shall be called Ross on Why, and wye not?


When the poll first appeared, it had the same question but our owner was still Ellis Short and no one voting had a clear idea of how questions of succession and managership would be answered.

Amid that uncertainty, the early response was understandably slow. But even then, readers sensed change was afoot and voted encouragingly in favour of an immediate promotion back to the Championship being likely.

There was, at first, a surge of optimism – yes, we’ll go up as champions – tempered by a strong minority vote for no promotion at all and a stubborn pessimist faction fearing another relegation battle. That changed but most still seemed to think we’d be promoted one way or the other.

Now we have new owners. We have a manager who has succeeded in Scotland. the hope we cannot stand has returned.

And as I write, the effect on supporters’ expectations has been profound. In place of keep-the-faith loyalty – loosely translated as “of course we’ll go up – won’t we?” – there is genuine belief. Pete Sixsmith has eloquently explained why that may be the case: click this phrase.

The vote now stands – again, as I write – at nearly 82 per cent believing promotion is on. More than half of those thinking that way (43 per cent of the total 510 votes cast) say we will win the League One title. Only 14 per cent fear we won’t go up and under four per cent now expect a fight to avoid League Two.

Only two people have entered responses of their own: “no idea, ask me again in late July” and “too early to call”. That is hardly surprising, though the original question remains the same and asks only for a gut feeling.

Call it blind faith if you will but for the overwhelming majority – and this is a notion supported by casual scrutiny of SAFC supporters’ social media posts elsewhere – we might just be on the brink of a new and uplifting Sunderland era.

Click the image and you are whisked back to the Salut! Sunderland home page

Tags: , , ,

Salut! Sunderland is written, illustrated and edited by - and principally for - supporters of Sunderland AFC. The site aims to be sufficiently literate and entertaining to appeal to people who do not follow SAFC but enjoy good football writing.

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Doncaster Rovers vs SAFC Guess the Score

Click Jake's image to enter

For this midweek visit to Doncaster Rovers, Salut! Sunderland reverts to a “just for fun” format for the Guess the […]

Shrewsbury v Sunderland: The view from the middle ground

McCormick's Craic(featured image) full size 640 x 138

I’m busy today, with stuff to do, so I only have time for some quick thoughts. Don’t forget these are […]

Sixer’s Shrewsbury Soapbox: Success in Salop

Sixer'sSoapbox(featured image)

  John McCormick writes: It’s only 70-80 miles from home to the New Meadow but three trains meant for a time-consuming journey.  […]

Sixer’s Shrewsbury Sevens: 2-0 to SAFC, a comfortable win and that elusive clean sheet

Sixer's Sevens (featured image)

Monsieur Salut writes: this is where Pete Sixsmith offers his customary seven-word verdict on each Sunderland game he attends. He […]

‘SAFC should walk this division.’ Shrewsbury Town ‘Who are You?’ (2)

Click Jake's image to see all Who are You? instalments so far this season

In the first part of a long interview with Glyn Price*, co-presenter of the Shrewsbury Town podcast Salopcast, we heard […]

Ha’way this Lad: Eric Keeler runs from sea to shining sea for Spinal Research

c

Put aside thoughts about any other Keeler you may have heard of. Ours – that is to say, our fellow-Sunderland […]

Page generated in 1.137 seconds. Stats plugin by www.blog.ca