When I first put this poll up, a mere week ago, I wrote

“this is predominantly a Sunderland site and we aren’t claiming results are totally unbiased… …Nevertheless, I think it’s fair to say that SAFC  fans have not been blindly optimistic.”

After only a week I would not able to add a lot to this statement, were it not for two things. The first is that the poll was tagged to promote it to all League One fans for over 24 hours before it was promoted on our facebook page and then on Colin’s subsequent posts on this site. This gave us a small (very small, as it happens) hint of what the whole of the League One fanbase might think. The second was that Colin’s own poll closed, with some findings we can bring to bear on this one.

In the first 24 hours the voting matched the bookies, with one exception. Barnsley (the bookies’ second favourite) and Sunderland were neck and neck, each with 20% of 213 votes – a very small number by our standards, and one that allowed for a lot of leeway, given that as few as 42 people could have provided those votes:

Portsmouth and Charlton weren’t doing too badly, then came Luton, Scunthorpe, Burton and Bradford City. Walsall, I might add, were the only club without any votes.

Then came that facebook  page, followed by the closing of Colin’s “gut feeling” poll, and the home club effect they brought with them.  Colin’s poll shows over 80% of Sunderland fans think we’ll go up, only 15% think we won’t. And that’s probably why, once those fans – or some of them, moved on to this poll SAFC leaped ahead of Barnsley.

Within one day Sunderland gained about twice as many new votes as Barnsley; by day five Sunderland totaled 170 and Barnsley 95. Percentage shares of the vote had changed accordingly – from 20% each Sunderland had gone to 28% and Barnsley had dropped to 15%:

Other clubs’ shares of the vote also changed but not everyone’s share dropped. You might notice other differences between the two graphs, especially if you Support Burton Albion, Luton Town or Peterborough United.

Along with Barnsley, Portsmouth and Charlton remain fancied, and my gut feeling is that they will stay in the top six, but with only 601 votes cast (at the time of writing) a few crosses here and there have the potential to move other clubs up and down quite a lot. Even Walsall, with only 2 votes by day 5, had jumped over Rochdale who got one vote early on and then no more.

Sunderland fans, by virtue of greater numbers, have ensured their club will feature throughout the season but, realistically, this was always going to be the case. Other clubs’ fans can still do the same, though I expect the final result will be a little more impartial because of the number of choices on offer – up to six clubs per reader – and the number of clubs involved. I say a little more as I can’t guarantee total impartiality and don’t particularly want to. I’d like it if more people took part and we reached the 7,000+ votes we achieved in our Premiership days but what I get will do.

I’ve now made results visible and you can monitor changes to see how well your club is doing for the next few weeks, until our poll closes with the start of the season and the close of the transfer window. When that happens I’ll tell you what I’ll be doing with the clubs placed in the top six.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Salut! Sunderland is written, illustrated and edited by - and principally for - supporters of Sunderland AFC. The site aims to be sufficiently literate and entertaining to appeal to people who do not follow SAFC but enjoy good football writing.

3 Responses to “Barnsley drop, Burton and Posh replace Luton and Scunthorpe, Walsall get off the bottom in our promotion poll.” Subscribe

  1. John Mac June 29, 2018 at 12:30 pm #

    The poll results aren’t showing when I call this page up on my laptop. I will investigate.

    Watch this space

    • John Mac June 29, 2018 at 1:54 pm #

      I still can’t see the results when I use Chrome and Windows 10, other browsers seem OK and my android handheld’s fine. Votes are being recorded, so the only suggestion I can make if your page is hanging is to try a different browser (or OS).

  2. les June 29, 2018 at 12:49 pm #

    obviously these people completely ingored last seasons meetings between sunderland and Barnsley. we all know how accurate polls are. sunderland looked like a league two side and could be one come next may.come on you tykes

Leave a Reply

Sixer’s Sevens: Maja and Gooch lead the charge as St Mirren hit for six


Pete Sixsmith would have enjoyed this, but was nowhere near Scotland as Jack Ross went back to his last club, […]

Farewell Billy Jones and Callum McManaman and welcome Glenn Loovens

<a href="http://salutsunderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/twitter.jpg"><img title="twitter" src="http://salutsunderland.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/twitter.jpg" alt="" width="16" height="16" /></a>
<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/salutsunderland">
And follow us on Twitter: @salutsunderland ... click along this line</a>

Salut! Sunderland extends a hearty welcome to Glenn Loovens, who arrives as a free agent having been released by Sheffield […]

Should Sunderland be giving away a lot less about transfer targets?

Another of Jake's Salut! banners

Monsieur Salut discusses the need for a sensible balance between openness and discretion in the pre-season transfer market… Who knows? […]

For Sunderland, the only way is up – starting with Charlton Athletic

Jake's back - and so are  Charlton

Monsieur Salut writes: in just over two weeks, only Sunderland’s second season as far down as the third tier kicks […]

Sixer’s Hartlepool Soapbox: bravo Benji, bravo (later) France, bad show Byrne’s boys

Margaret Byrne

Not so cool at the Pool, said Peter Sixsmith. Benji Kimpioka was cool, as were others of the young players […]

Sixer’s Sevens: Kimpioka spares the blushes to maintain a superb pre-season (for him)

Sixer's Sevens (featured image)

The 2018-19 edition of Sixer’s Sevens, in which Pete Sixsmith or a super-sub sums up each Sunderland game in seven […]