Tag Archives: Pete Lynn

Kate Bush says ‘Don’t give up’, and so does Wrinkly Pete

Wrinkly Pete(featured image)

John McCormick writes: So you think it’s bad, do you? In this post Wrinkly Pete opens with a reminder of a time when the mortgage interest rate was just about dropping into single figures after peaking at 15%+, Sunderland were struggling in the bottom half of the second division and averaging gates of under 20,000, and down […]

Read More 0 Comments

Wrinkly Pete’s crystal ball: the post-Spurs update

Wrinkly Pete(featured image)

When Peter Lynn, young-at-heart  but prematurely aged physically by watching Sunderland, began his exercise in calculating how the rest of the season would go, he concluded that 37 points would be enough for survival – and that we’d get them. After enduring the atrocious displays at home to Stoke and then at West Brom, even forgetting […]

Read More 2 Comments

Sixer’s Walsall Sevens: Third time unlucky? Maybe not.

Jake

Pete Sixsmith may be busy on the Saturdays before Christmas but on the weekdays he leaves the work to his […]

Rate the ref: Walsall at home, FA cup replay

Rate The Ref featured image

Our first home game since the series started. We don’t expect many ratings for away games but we should get […]

Walsall Who are You: Sunderland ‘pretty useful going forward, less convincing off the ball’

se

Monsieur Salut writes: this is a Who are You? with a difference ahead of tonight’s FA Cup 2nd round replay […]

Salut advent calendar: what strange goings on lie behind door 11?

In the run up to Christmas Day, behind each door of the Salut! Sunderland advent calendar is an article written […]

Walsall Guess the Score: ‘can we play you every week? Oh, we already do’

Click on the image above, post your scoreline prediction and - whoever you support - you may win a prize

The experience of Saturday prompts a rule addition for the Salut! Sunderland prize Guess the Score: a match abandoned = […]

Wham: Going ballistic at Accrington Stanley

McCormick's Craic(featured image) full size 640 x 138

There has been a bit of discussion on the calling off and whether (no pun intended) it was or wasn’t […]

Page generated in 2.120 seconds. Stats plugin by www.blog.ca