Man City 4 SAFC 3: a shambles Observed

The Observer came calling again. Pete Sixsmith not only had to endure comic defending by Sunderland. he then had to write about it. Poor Mark Hughes, yes. But poor, poor Pete …

Pete Sixsmith, Don’t for one minute think that this was a game full of sparkling attacking football – it wasn’t. It was full of poor defending. All four City goals came down our right-hand side where Nyron Nosworthy had the nightmare of all nightmares. McCartney was little better and we must have the worst pair of full-backs in the Premier League. When we attacked City they wobbled but our final ball was not consistent – we gave it away far too cheaply, and to lump it up far too quickly.

The fan’s player ratings: Fulop 6; Nosworthy 2, Turner 7, Mensah 7 (Healy 76 4), McCartney 3; Reid 6; Campbell 5 (Richardson 59 5), Henderson 7, Cattermole 6, Malbranque 5 (Jones 40 6); Bent 7.

Robert O’Brien, Observer reader We were lucky to win. We’re not showing the form or class that can take us into the top six let alone the top four, but we looked a lot better with Santa Cruz up front as the target man, with Tevez buzzing around him. I think Hughes should go and I know we’ll get pilloried in the press for being ruthless but if you ask any City fans they’ll say he’s not generated any sort of buzz or enthusiasm. Mancini is not who I’d have picked but the next boss would definitely not have a British passport.

The fan’s player ratings: Given 6; Richards 6 (Zabaleta 21 5), Onuoha 6, Touré 6, Sylvinho 6; Ireland 6, Barry 6, Wright-Phillips 5 (Kompany 52 6), Bellamy 8; Tevez 7, (Petrov 86 n/a), Santa Cruz 8

Tags: , ,

Salut! Sunderland is written, illustrated and edited by - and principally for - supporters of Sunderland AFC. The site aims to be sufficiently literate and entertaining to appeal to people who do not follow SAFC but enjoy good football writing.

6 Responses to “Man City 4 SAFC 3: a shambles Observed” Subscribe

  1. jane December 20, 2009 at 12:32 am #

    pete were u in boldon asda on saturday afternoon?

  2. Pete Sixsmith December 20, 2009 at 10:23 am #

    No Jane, I was sat at Eastlands, watching one of the most inept
    defensive displays I have ever seen. I must have a double. Thanks for asking, though.

  3. Redan_White December 20, 2009 at 2:11 pm #

    Mr ‘Doom’ Sixsmith do you mean the two offside goals and dodgy penalty that Noz gave away.

    I find that bitterness and increasing age go hand in hand with football.

    Blame Noz, not exquisite attacking play by City, the easy option, attacking your own players.

    Is it with ever diminishing years the need for instant gratification from your team becomes the norm or are you just complying to the current strictures of the Premier Leauge(Nial and Ellis excluded)??

  4. Pete Sixsmith December 20, 2009 at 4:32 pm #

    Sorry, but City were given so much room that they could have driven a fleet of Arriva busses through the gaps we left. They are not a good side and were there to be beaten. To score 3 goals away from home and get nothing is not good.
    Bitterness or reality? The reality is 1 point from the last 15 and 5 successive away defeats. I can do bitterness, but I don’t think I will have to; things will improve – won’t they?
    Keep taking those Happy Pills; they block out the harsh facts of reality.
    Have a good Christmas.

  5. Redan_White December 22, 2009 at 12:05 pm #

    All you say is true but why let Noz carry the can when the right hand midfield is far more to blame. The worlds best rightback would have been embarresed in that game. Acres of space with either two or three City players for Noz to cover. Do you attack the invisible Campbell NO, you attack Nyron because it makes good press for the bandwagon jumpers, PATHETIC!!

  6. Redan_White December 22, 2009 at 12:14 pm #

    In fact looking at your player ratings makes me wonder if you know your ginglymus from your gluteus maximus.

    Noz 2
    Campbell 5

    I may be on happy pills but you are away with the mixer BIG STYLE To be quite frank for you to give those scores does make me wonder if you are more interested in the ‘reality’ or a good ‘leader’?

Leave a Reply

Sixer’s Accrington Stanley Soapbox:Wham! Bam! Thank you Stan!

SOAPBOX (featured image)

Malcolm Dawson writes……what a contrast between yesterday and my previous visit to The Wham Stadium. Less than twelve months ago […]

Sixer’s Accrington Sevens: when the result matters and the team delivers it’s a good day, despite…


Pete Sixsmith gives us value for money on yet another trip across the Pennines. He sent a pre-match text telling […]

The Brexit Debate. Today: the not so good Europeans of Sunderland AFC

content/uploads/2012/02/twitter.jpg"><img title="twitter" src="" alt="" width="16" height="16" /></a>
<a href="!/salutsunderland">
And follow us on Twitter: @salutsunderland ... click along this line</a>

Malcolm Dawson writes…..with the seemingly never ending issue of Brexit, the prorogation of Parliament and the confusing and contradictory outpourings […]

The Brexit issue: The good and not so good Europeans of Sunderland AFC

content/uploads/2012/02/twitter.jpg"><img title="twitter" src="" alt="" width="16" height="16" /></a>
<a href="!/salutsunderland">
And follow us on Twitter: @salutsunderland ... click along this line</a>

Malcolm Dawson writes…..I was 19 when I was first able to vote in a General Election. Sunderland were the holders […]

Accrington Stanley vs Sunderland Who are You? .. any Stanley fans up for questions?

Guess the Score - but just for fun. Click the banner ..

It would be an exaggeration to say Salut! Sunderland expects dozens of Stanley fans to turn up here and answer […]

Accrington Stanley vs Sunderland: just as we were enjoying a break from football …

Click on the image above, post your scoreline prediction and - whoever you support - you may win a prize

Yes, it’s back. Proper football, I mean, says Monsieur Salut. Along with plenty of others, if probably still a minority, […]

Page generated in 5.480 seconds. Stats plugin by