Ken Gambles: ‘would a Gooner rhyme my surname with stumbles?’

One minor regret of our 10 seasons in the Premier League is that this spell ends without the authorities taking up the ingenious suggestions from our own Ken Gambles of making shirt-pullers wear bright pink knitted mittens and divers pull on goggles. Undeterred, Ken has come up with other thoughts on rule changes, this time proposing sanctions designed to punish offending teams, not humiliate individuals …

There will be ample time for inquests on this benighted season of ours subsequent to May 21, so before then I’d just like to raise a few issues about the game at large.

Call me a traditionalist – I do – as one brought up on a working-class game that has formed a major part of my life for over 60 years.

There’s much about the modern game I dislike but I’m stuck with it until I go to that stadium in the sky. I’m not a fan of changing the laws of football yet I must admit my reservations about the back pass law proved wrong and it has greatly helped the flow of a match.There are though some further changes I would like to see.

The first two would be easy to effect and would change what at present gives an unfair advantage.

From a goal kick, if the ball does not leave the area (unless prevented from doing so by an opposition player) a corner should result as it has always seemed unfair that there is no disadvantage to the side making a mistake. Also if a goalkeeper is fouled yet retains possession of the ball it penalises him to be made to take a deadball kick rather than allowing play to restart with a kick from his hands.

More difficult changes concern the blatant time-wasting which increasingly blights most games I watch.

There should be no substitutions allowed after 80 minutes.

Should extra time be needed then any remaining subs could then be used. This should prevent the procession of hold-ups which seem a preponderance in the last 15 minutes of most games and are extremely frustrating even when Sunderland are not involved.

Furthermore if goalkeepers are deemed to be wasting time over a goal kick (Ben Foster can take as long as 45 seconds to a minute to take his), a corner should be awarded.

When players clearly take the ball up to the corner flag to waste time, just give a goal kick. Likewise the infuriating non-taking of a corner that barely leaves the quadrant should be penalised by a goal-kick,

I realise these changes would mean more decisions for the referee to make but I am totally fed up with games being deliberately spoiled because teams seem to lack confidence in their own ability to hold on to a scoreline and consequently cheat the crowd of action.

Tags: , ,

Salut! Sunderland is written, illustrated and edited by - and principally for - supporters of Sunderland AFC. The site aims to be sufficiently literate and entertaining to appeal to people who do not follow SAFC but enjoy good football writing.

3 Responses to “Gambles Rambles: time to punish timewasters and ban late substitutions” Subscribe

  1. Graeme Garvey May 10, 2017 at 1:26 pm #

    A number of good points, here. These dodges are all about trying to kill off a game, aren’t they? Everyone knows it goes on, so why not try some (or all) of these ideas? The 80-minute substitution ban and goal kick for taking the ball to the corner would be worth trying just to see what ruses they’d then dream up to waste time.

  2. david miller May 11, 2017 at 1:13 pm #

    Can’t see the 80 minute subs idea taking on, players will just pretend they’re injured to get replaced.

    Goalies time-wasting goal kicks irritate the life out of me. There should be a 20 second rule.

    Having said that, Shack created another bit of folklore by backheeling a corner for a throw in, knowing it would waste time, it confused everyone.

    And I recall Baxter hitting the sweetest curling 60 yarder into the far corner of the main stand at Roker, where no-one was sitting (no ball boys in those days), and it wasted at least a minute, we all had a laugh.

  3. KenG May 11, 2017 at 7:54 pm #

    David,you are probably right but I would say no subs irrespective of injuries or not. You would just have to play with one man down for ten minutes or so.

Leave a Reply

Sixer’s Rochdale Soapbox: Pints and points on the wet side of the Pennines

SOAPBOX (featured image)

Malcolm Dawson writes……..make no mistake. This was no walk in the park and Rochdale made us work hard for the […]

Sixer’s Sevens: Rochdale don’t make it easy but Sunderland get there

Jake

John McCormick writes: I should have been there today but life got in the way, as it so often does. […]

Rochdale vs Sunderland: aiming to make it three wins in three

Jake: 'Monsieur Salut must be in a bad mood again - no prize this time'

The most important point to be made about tomorrow night’s game at the Spotland Stadium is that we must aim […]

Rochdale vs Sunderland: hard acts for Dale fans to follow

Click the banner to find all the Who are You? entries this season

Ahead of another important test for Jack Ross’s new-look squad, Salut! Sunderland poses a few questions to Rochdale fans in […]

Sixer’s sevens: Portsmouth make it heavy at the Stadium of Light

Sixer's Sevens (featured image)

John McCormick writes: Let’s not quibble. We were not good. However, we had enough character to come back from a […]

Did beating Sunderland at Wembley compensate for not going up? Portsmouth views invited

Click the banner to find all the Who are You? entries this season

NB: the official web address of Salut! Sunderland is now https://salutsunderland.com for those who like to bookmark the site. Using […]

Page generated in 1.422 seconds. Stats plugin by www.blog.ca